PGS has been performed for several indications:
For each of these indications, studies of IVF with PGS relying on day 3 biopsy of a blastomere and FISH analysis have now been completed. Most have concluded that the end result, birth of a healthy infant, is not increased with PGS. The implantation rates are not significantly better, the pregnancy rates are not significantly better. Some studies have shown a decrease in miscarriage, but other studies have not.
For these reasons, IVF with PGS has not significantly increased the chance of pregnancy over IVF alone. PGS did reduce the risk of facing a decision for genetic termination. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine published a Committee Opinion in 2008, stating that the routine use of PGS with FISH and a day 3 biopsy did not improve the live-birth rates in patients with advance maternal age, previous implantation failure ore recurrent miscarriage.
There are still individual situations in which PGS may be appropriate. It is important to discuss your particular case with your physician.
Now, the new question is whether a day 5 biopsy with either CGH or SNP assays will yield better results. Because of the evolving information about PGS, RSC’s recommendation is to perform the biopsy on day 5 and perform either CGH or SNP. This requires cryopreservation of the embryo until the genetic report is available, delaying a transfer by 4 weeks. RSC has had excellent pregnancy rates with frozen thawed blastocyst embryos and clinical trials from other centers performing day 5 biopsy with freeze then thaw of embryos have reported pregnancy rates comparable to a fresh transfer.