Schedule Appointment

Many of the first “IVF babies” were born amidst ethical concerns over the ‘brave new world’ technology that became commercially available in the mid-80s. RSC fertility specialists like Dr. Donald Galen, who began his practice in 1975, have been leaders in developing the reproductive technology that has enabled a steady stream of medical breakthroughs and “greater freedom for individuals to alter their reproductive lives,” said Galen, who is now surgical and research director of RSC.

The past 25 years have put his “maturing but still-young medical specialty” under a wholly different kind of lens than was the case when Galen helped the family of Travis McCullar of Livermore. In 1986 when McCullar was born in Walnut Creek, he was the nation’s second successful transfer of a previously frozen embryo into a mother’s uterus. “In those days I was frequently involved in live televised debates with medical ethicists on the news of Travis’ birth!” recalled Galen.

Early infertility practice by specialists known as reproductive endocrinologists, i.e., OB/GYNS who completed years of advanced training in reproductive endocrinology and infertility, related primarily to tubal surgery for women, which wasn’t very successful, said Galen. “Once we were able to retrieve eggs vaginally to use for IVF, the field changed radically. The births of the first IVF babies turned the world upside down, and it was terribly exciting,” Galen said.

“Fortunately, much of the initial concern about test-tube babies, cloning, and designer babies has been assuaged by the medical benefits of reproductive technology. From gender selection to deciding who has rights to be parents, we probably will always face unresolved issues around embryo technology both within the medical community and society at large,” he added.

In recent decades, advancements in embryology technology have dramatically improved IVF pregnancy success rates and healthier babies. In vitro pregnancy rates continue to soar far beyond those in the first decade of IVF, when most women had a 5 to 10 percent chance of conceiving through IVF. (Today, the national average is better than one in three.) The development of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 1993 allowed for the treatment of male factor infertility, and recent successes with egg freezing and embryonic genetic screening have been embraced by thousands of couples who not long ago would likely have not been candidates for IVF.

Below is a summary of recent developments and issues that Galen said are shaping both medicine and society today:

Reduction of multiple births

The trend toward more single embryo transfers particularly for older women to improve success rates and avoid the complications associated with multiple births. Currently, physicians routinely transfer two or more embryos for women that are 35 or older. The future of reproductive medicine is focusing on improving techniques for growing and selecting the best quality embryos.

Cryopreservation

Science may give women of the future greater ability to postpone marriage and family even more with newer approaches like vitrification. With traditional slow-freeze techniques, the egg is stored in liquid nitrogen until it is ready to be thawed and fertilized. On the other hand, vitrification fast freezes the egg, which prevents the formation of ice crystals in the egg. Ice formation is dangerous because it may rupture the cell membranes causing cellular destruction. Early studies have shown improved survival and pregnancy rates with the vitrification process.

Embryonic disease screening

Pre-implantation genetic diagnoses (PGD) allows physicians to screen embryos for genetic diseases, such as cystic fibrosis and Tay-Sach’s disease, prior to IVF. The number of diseases detectible by PGD is growing geometrically and now numbers in the hundreds. The technique can be also be used to select embryos of one gender in preference. It may be possible to make other “social selection” choices in the future as well. “However, as genetic testing becomes more sophisticated it poses ethical issues about creating ‘designer babies.’ And as many colleagues ask, just because we can, should we?” poses Galen.

[hoops name=”PR-contact”]

“Wanted: Pioneer IVF Babies: Are you One?” RSC celebrates 25th anniversary by re-uniting up to 280 of America’s oldest “test-tube babies” in June

SAN RAMON, CALIFORNIA, (February 12, 2009) – To celebrate its 25th anniversary as of the one of the nation’s first private IVF clinics, the Reproductive Science Center of the San Francisco Bay Area (RSC) announced today the launch of “Wanted: Pioneer IVF Babies. Are You One?” – a nationwide six-month campaign to attempt to reconnect with nearly 300 of their first success stories, conceived in the years 1984 through 1986.

Established in 1983, just two years after the first successful birth through in vitro fertilization (IVF) in the United States, RSC was also responsible for the nation’s second successful birth of a baby from a frozen embryo.

RSC’s first baby born through IVF was born March 18, 1985, although the practice no longer has information on the family’s whereabouts. (Patient privacy standards prohibit the practice from disclosing the family’s names publicly, but RSC has begun a search for the baby and her parents.) RSC estimates that about 30 “IVF babies” were born through their practice that same year; about 100 others were born in 1985, and another 150 were born in 1986. All are now in their 20s, and the practice’s six physicians hope to meet as many as possible as adults at a special RSC Family Day reunion, June 14, 2009, from noon to 4 p.m. at Little Hills Ranch in San Ramon.

“Our first babies have grown up and no doubt scattered far and wide,” said Dr. Donald Galen, one of the founding physicians of the practice and a fertility expert still active at RSC. “We also wish to reconnect with them for further study of the impact of IVF on their lives and to continue to collect long term data to help future generations.”

RSC is using a variety of means to try to locate these first IVF babies, especially through the Internet. The oldest baby found will have his/her travel expenses paid to attend the June reunion. RSC’s Facebook page features more information on its 25th Anniversary and nationwide search for its original IVF babies. A subgroup has been added to the page exclusively reserved for families of RSC’s original babies to exchange comments and share stories of their “miracle babies” then and now.

[hoops name=”PR-contact”]

A California IVF pioneer marvels at initial outcry

As Louise Brown turns 30 on July 25, Bay Area fertility expert Dr. Donald Galen reflects on fears of the past, hopes of the future

SAN RAMON, CALIFORNIA, (July 21, 2008) – With this month marking the thirtieth birthday of the world’s first “test-tube baby,” one of the Bay Area’s first fertility specialists says that much of the initial ethical worries over the ‘brave new world’ technology has given way to unforeseen developments and medical advancements that few could have predicted over the last three decades – accompanied at the same time by the rise of new ethical and sociological questions.

On July 25, English postal worker Louise Joy Brown celebrates her 30th birthday as the world’s first child born through in vitro fertilization (IVF). With subsequent advancements in embryology technology have come both medical breakthroughs and greater freedoms for individuals to alter their reproductive lives. The combination, said the IVF pioneer, has put his maturing specialty under a wholly different kind of lens than was the case in 1978.

“In the early days I was frequently involved in live televised debates with medical ethicists on the news of that birth,” said Dr. Donald Galen, who began his practice in 1975 and is now surgical and research director of Reproductive Science Center of the Bay Area. Galen was responsible for the nation’s second successful transfer of a previously frozen embryo into a mother’s uterus in 1986 in Walnut Creek.

“The first IVF baby turned the world upside down, and it was terribly exciting. But much of the initial concern about test-tube babies, cloning, and designer babies has been eclipsed by widespread acceptance of the medical benefits of reproductive technology,” Galen said.

“Furthermore, our procedures and quality control are infinitely superior now.” In the early days, what took weeks of testing and diagnosis now takes a few days and seems almost routine, “but it never lacks for miracles.”

During the last few decades, advancements in embryology technology have dramatically improved reproductive medicine with higher success rates and healthier babies. In vitro pregnancy rates continue to soar far beyond those in the first decade of IVF, when most women had a 5 to 10 percent chance of conceiving through IVF. (Today, the national average is better than one in three.) Since 1993, the development of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) allowed for the treatment of male factor infertility, and recent forays into donated human eggs and genetic screening have mushroomed in popularity among couples who not long ago would likely have not been candidates for IVF.
“From gender selection of unborn babies to deciding who has rights to be parents, we probably will always face unresolved issues around embryo technology both within the medical community and society at large,” Galen added.

[hoops name=”PR-contact”]